Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 13 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 13 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 13 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 12 December, 2022 | 0

    The principle of restrictive doctrine of sovereignty in an employment dispute.

    Case:

    The United States of America v Menteri Sumber Manusia & Ors [2022] MLJU 1258 – FEDERAL COURT [Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-18-10/2021(W)]

    Brief Facts:

    • The United States of America (the ‘USA) is a sovereign state which has established a diplomatic mission, the Embassy of the United States of America in Kuala Lumpur.
     
    • Subramaniam a/l Letchimanan (the ‘Mr.Subra), a Malaysian, was employed as a security guard at the Embassy.
     
    • The dispute in the present case arose when Mr. Subra was dismissed from his employment by USA via a phone call from an official of the Embassy with no reasons given.
     
    • Feeling aggrieved, the Mr. Subra filed a representation under section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (“IRA 1967”) claiming his dismissal by the Embassy was wrongful.

     

    • The Minister of Human Resources then referred the matter to the Industrial Court for adjudication.
     
    • Before Mr. Subra could proceed to file his claim at the Industrial Court, USA filed an ex-parte application to the High Court for leave to commence judicial review proceedings seeking amongst others that a declaration be made that USA and the Embassy were immune from the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court.
     
    • The High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to hear Mr. Subra’s claim and was of the view that USA was immune from the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court. This was because the Mr. Subra’s duty as a security guard is integral to the sovereign activity of its sovereign authority and as such the doctrine is applicable.
     
    • Subsequently, an appeal was filed and the Court of Appeal allowed and set aside the High Court’s decision. Hence, this appeal before the Federal Court by USA.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The Court held that the Minister has a wide and unfettered discretion under Section 20(3) of the IRA to refer representation to the Industrial Court, provided that he has acted bona fide and has not taken into account extraneous or irrelevant matters.
     
    • The applicability of restrictive doctrine of sovereign immunity depends on the finding of facts of the precise nature, duties as well as job scope of Mr. Subra.
     
    • Hence, the Federal Court held that the proper forum to decide on the issue of the nature of his job and dismissal should be the Industrial Court, after complete consideration of both oral and documentary evidence.
     
    • Further, the Federal Court was of the view that precedent cases in other jurisdictions involving Employment Tribunals showed that, the Industrial Court has the duty of fact-finding to determine the applicability of the restrictive doctrine of sovereign immunity.
     
    • In conclusion, the Federal Court held that the appropriate and only forum to determine whether USA and the Embassy were immune being sued was the Industrial Court. Hence, the appeal was dismissed.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil