Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 12 of 2020

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 12 of 2020
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 12 of 2020

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 14 January, 2021 | 0

    Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment?

    Case:

    AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494

    Brief Facts:

    • Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointment for the position of consultant from AIMS. The contract for consultancy services was for a fixed term from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 (“Consultant Contract”).

     

    • Ahmad received three (3) subsequent renewals in respect of the Consultant Contract for a further twelve (12) months’ period each, up to 30 September 2013. The terms and conditions of the Consultant Contract remained unchanged.

     

    • However, the third subsequent renewal of the Consultant Contract for a further twelve (12) months’ period from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013 was as a consultant of AIMS Cyberjaya Sdn Bhd (“AIMS Cyberjaya”) instead of AIMS due to the phasing out of AIMS. All the terms and conditions remained the same as the original Consultant Contract and the letter was signed by the chief executive officer of AIMS Cyberjaya.

     

    • AIMS was subsequently consolidated into AIMS Cyberjaya. In view of the company restructure, Ahmad was re-designated to assume his position of Vice President, Product & Solutions in AIMS Cyberjaya from 1 January 2013.

     

    • Ahmad was given a letter by AIMS Cyberjaya offering him further employment from 1 October 2013 until 30 September 2014. However, AIMS Cyberjaya sought to exclude a performance bonus scheme which was present in Ahmad’s previous employment terms.

     

    • Ahmad had informed the chief executive officer of AIMS Cyberjaya that he was not agreeable to the new terms and conditions of the contract.

     

    • AIMS Cyberjaya renewed Ahmad’s contract for a further period of three (3) months from 1 October 2013 to 31 December 2013. The terms and conditions of the contract still remained unchanged, i.e. excluding the performance bonus scheme.

     

    • Ahmad informed AIMS Cyberjaya that he was unable to accept their offer, via an email.

     

    • Ahmad later received a letter notifying him that AIMS Cyberjaya had given him two (2) months’ notice of expiry of his contract from 1 November 2013 to 31 December 2013. AIMS Cyberjaya also informed Ahmad that they had decided to grant him an early release from his employment with effect from 19 October 2013.

     

    • Ahmad made a representation to the Industrial Relations Department under section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (“Act”) that he had been unfairly dismissed without just cause and excuse and the reconciliation attempts before the Industrial Relations Department failed and the matter was subsequently referred to the Industrial Court for adjudication.

     

    • The Industrial Court held that Ahmad was a permanent employee of AIMS Cyberjaya and the “fixed term contracts” were not genuine fixed term contracts and Ahmad’s dismissal was without just cause and excuse. The Industrial Court awarded back wages of twenty-four (24) months and compensation of one and a half (1 1/2) month salary for each year of Ahmad’s service in lieu of reinstatement.

     

    • Dissatisfied with the award of the Industrial Court, AIMS Cyberjaya filed a judicial review application to quash the Industrial Court’s award.

     

    • The High Court dismissed AIMS Cyberjaya’s application for judicial review and AIMS Cyberjaya appealed to the Court of Appeal.

     

    • The Court of Appeal allowed AIMS Cyberjaya’s appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court and the award of the Industrial Court.

     

    • Ahmad then appealed to the Federal Court.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    • The Federal Court held that the Court of Appeal had erred in finding that a foreign national cannot have a permanent contract of employment.

     

    • It held that the citizenship of Ahmad has no bearing in deciding whether Ahmad was in permanent employment or in employment under a fixed term contract.

     

    • The Act does not make any distinction between the citizens of Malaysia and non-citizens.

     

    • Further, Malaysia is a member country of the International Labour Organisation which includes an undertaking to promote and guarantee equality of opportunity and treatment between migrant workers and nationals.

     

    • The Federal Court also held that the renewing of the fixed term contract meant that the contract was in effect a permanent employment contract
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    • Legal Update 17 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can service charge received by employees as incentives be incorporated into the calculation of their basic salary to meet the requirement of minimum wage? Case: CRYSTAL CROWN HOTEL & RESORT SDN BHD (CRYSTAL CROWN HOTELRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 3 of 2022
    • Legal Update 2 of 2022
    • Legal Update 1 of 2022
    • Legal Update 24 of 2021 (end)
    • Legal Update 23 of 2021
    • Legal Update 22 of 2021
    • Legal Update 21 of 2021

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil