Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 14 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 14 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 14 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 12 December, 2022 | 0

    Can an employer be deemed liable for the torts committed by his independent contractors?

    Case:

    Hemraj & Co Sdn Bhd & Anor v Tenaga Nasional Bhd & Ors [2022] 7 CLJ 169

    Brief Facts:

    • The 1st Appellant (‘Hemraj & Co’), owned a bungalow and had appointed the 2nd Respondent contractor (‘R2’) to connect the bungalow’s sewerage system to a sewerage tank owned by Indah Water Konsortium Sdn Bhd (‘IWK’).
     
    • To enable the connection to be made, a part of the public road in front of the bungalow had to be excavated.
     
    • The excavation work was tasked to the 3rd Respondent (‘R3’), a licensed sewerage contractor while the 4th Respondent (‘R4’) hired a backhoe operator and supervised the excavation.
     
    • The excavation work was carried out without obtaining the pre-requisite approvals of the 1st Respondent (‘Tenaga National Berhad’), the local authority (‘DBKL’) and IWK.
     
    • The works had damaged a 132KV underground cable belonging to TNB.
     
    • TNB then sued the Hemraj & Co and its director (the 2nd Appellant) and thereafter obtained a judgment against Hemraj for RM3,110,445.09 plus administrative costs to replace the damaged cable.
     
    • The High Court judge in his judgement held that Hemraj & Co was negligent in breaching its non-delegable duty of care by allowing the unauthorised excavation works to be carried out in a negligent manner by the contractors on a public road thereby damaging TNB’s underground cable.
     
    • Hemraj & Co appealed to the Court of Appeal. Hemraj & Co contended that they should not have been held liable for the negligence of R2, R3 and R4 who were independent contractors employed by Hemraj & Co.
     

    COURT OF APPEAL DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The Court of Appeal held that the general principle is that an employer is not liable for any tort/negligence committed by his independent contractor.
     
    • However, an employer may be liable for the tort/negligence committed by the independent contractor if the employer is deemed to have committed the tort himself.
     
    • This is an exception to the general rule and the employer is liable where the duty is held to be a non-delegable duty.
     
    • The Court of Appeal held that when Hemraj & Co engaged another contactor to do the works they had a positive duty to protect the underground cable and, a duty to the public who were users of electricity distributed/transmitted via the underground cable.
     
    • That duty cannot be delegated to the contactors appointed.
     
    • The Court also found that the Hemraj & Co was aware that the excavation works on a public road required permits from both DBKL and IWK.
     
    • The Court also found that Hemraj & Co was aware that the excavation works were carried out without the requisite permits from DBKL, IWK and TNB.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil