Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 12 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 12 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 12 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 12 December, 2022 | 0

    Can political parties sue individuals for defamatory statements?

    Case:

    Lim Lip Eng v Ong Ka Chuan (as a public officer of a society registered as Malaysian Chinese Association) [2022] MLJU 762 – FEDERAL COURT
    [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 02(i)-25-03 OF 2020(W)]

    Brief Facts:

    • Lim Lip Eng (“Appellant”) was at the material time a Member of Parliament for Segambut Constituency. Ong Ka Chuan (“Respondent”) is a public officer of a society registered as Malaysia Chinese Association (MCA).
     
    • In July 2017, the Respondent, on behalf of MCA, filed a defamation suit in his capacity as a public officer against the Appellant over remarks made at a press conference at the Parliament building in 2016 over allegations that the party had used government funds allocated for Chinese vernacular schools. The Respondent claimed that the Appellant’s remarks seriously injured MCA’s reputation, adding that the party was seeking RM100 million in general and exemplary damages.
     
    • The Appellant filed an application to strike out the suit on the basis that MCA being a political party does not have the locus standi or the right to sue for defamation.
     
    • The High Court rejected the Appellant’s application to strike out the suit. Subsequently, the Appellant lost his appeal at the Court of Appeal. Hence this present appeal to the Federal Court.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    • The Federal Court ruled that political parties cannot sue individuals for defamation.
     
    • There are two major elements that were raised by the Federal Court in coming to its decision.
     
    • The first element is on the issue of locus standi. The Federal Court was of the view that a political party, which is a registered society, is not a legal entity by itself which can sue and be sued in its own name. MCA is a mere political party which is dependent on its members to take action.
     
    • The second element is on the issue of public interest. The Federal Court held that a political party relies on the public to get their votes to be in power. The political party puts itself forward for office or to govern and be responsible for public administration. It is not right nor is it in the public interest to put the public in fear of a defamation suit and prevent them from expressing their views or making criticisms or voicing out opinion.
     
    • The Federal Court held that to allow this to happen definitely goes against the true value of democracy.
                    
    • The political party can always “answer back through public announcements”, press conferences or press statements or such similar social media posts.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil