Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 10 of 2021

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 10 of 2021
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 10 of 2021

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 15 June, 2021 | 0

    Can a celebrity’s name be used on clothing labels not sold by the celebrity?

    Case:

    MOHAMMAD HAFIZ HAMIDUN v. KAMDAR SDN BERHAD [2021] 1 LNS 590

    Brief Facts:

    • Hafiz Hamidun (“ Hafiz”) is a popular Nasyid singer and song composer. In addition to his role as an artist, he is also in the business of selling fabrics such as Baju Melayu and Kurtas online and in boutiques.

     

    • To carry out his trade in fabrics, En. Hafiz incorporated Haje Sdn Bhd (“HSB”).

     

    • Hafiz Hamidun is an unregistered trademark which En. Hafiz uses for his own fabrics line.

     

    • Kamdar Sdn Bhd (“Kamdar”) is a company primarily engaged in the business of selling fabrics. At the material time, Kamdar had 29 stores throughout various locations in Malaysia.

     

    • Sometime in February 2017, En. Hafiz received messages from his fans on his social media asking him whether certain goods with the label ‘Hafiz Hamidun’ were his.

     

    • Upon discovering this, En. Hafiz instructed his solicitors to write to Kamdar to demand that they stop using the label ‘Hafiz Hamidun’ on their products but Kamdar did not respond.

     

    • However, Kamdar stopped using the words ‘Hafiz Hamidun’ and instead replaced it with ‘Afiz Amidun’.

     

    • Hafiz claimed that in sound, style and substance the new label is the same as the old label.

     

    • Hafiz filed a suit against Kamdar in the High Court and the High Court found in favour of En. Hafiz.

     

    • The High Court determined on evidence that the name ‘Hafiz Hamidun’ was so inextricably linked to En. Hafiz and instrumental to his business that he had personally established goodwill in that label.

     

    • Even if goodwill was established in HSB, the corporate veil between the two (En. Hafiz and HSB) ought to be lifted in the interest of justice to reveal that En. Hafiz is HSB’s alter ego and that ownership still effectively lies with En. Hafiz.

     

    • The Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the High Court on what is a technical point in law. The Court of Appeal found that En. Hafiz did not have locus standi to maintain his claim against Kamdar as the Court opined that the claim was for HSB to prosecute.

     

    En. Hafiz appealed to the Federal Court.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    • The Federal Court set aside the judgement and order of the Court of Appeal and reinstated the order of the High Court.

     

    • In common law claim of passing off involving the business indicium of a celebrity, and provided that goodwill is factually established, either the celebrity in question or any of his licensees has the locus standi to commence an action in passing off against the misappropriating third parties.

     

    • The Federal Court affirmed that En. Hafiz is the owner of the goodwill in ‘Hafiz Hamidun.’
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil