Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 11 of 2021

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 11 of 2021
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 11 of 2021

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 2 July, 2021 | 0

    Is reducing sales commission a breach of an employment contract?

    Case:

    SANBOS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v GAN SOON HUAT [2021] 1 LNS 391

    Brief Facts:

    • Gan Soon Huat (“ Gan”) worked as a sales representative for Sanbos (“Employer”) since 1977.

     

    • He was assigned a sales coverage area, paid a monthly salary, and also paid a commission as is the norm with regard to sales representatives.

     

    • The sales commission rate was based on a formula that took into account the revenue collected from sales and the period within which it was collected. It was known as the Sales Commission Scheme.

     

    • The Sales Commission Scheme was revised in 2009 which was accepted by Mr. Gan and carried on as before until 2016 when it was revised again.

     

    • The Employer also removed Negeri Sembilan from the sales coverage area of Mr. Gan in 2016.

     

    • At the same time, the monthly sales target of Mr. Gan was increased from RM1,500,000.00 to RM1,690,000.00.

     

    • Gan wrote a letter to express his dissatisfaction.

     

    • He objected to the revised Sales Commission Scheme that lowered the sales commission rate. He said that it was not in accordance with his employment agreement as it would reduce his monthly sales commission by 42%.

     

    • Furthermore, the removal of Negeri Sembilan from his coverage area would reduce his monthly sales commission by 30%.

     

    • Gan did not resign upon receipt of the letter that notified him of the revision of the sales commission rate and the reorganization of the sales coverage area. He only resigned 9 months later and regarded himself as constructively dismissed.

     

    • Gan then lodged a complaint for constructive dismissal at the Industrial Relations Department. The matter was then referred to the Industrial Court

     

    • The Employer stated at the Industrial Court hearing that the said changes were made to streamline the business operation and to remain competitive.

     

    • Gan claimed that he remained in employment to collect evidence of a reduction in monthly income due to the appellant’s practice of releasing the commission a few months subsequent to collection of monies from sales.

     

    • The Industrial Court dismissed Mr. Gan’s claim.

     

    • However, the High Court found that the Industrial Court erred in finding that Mr. Gan was not constructively dismissed.

     

    The Employer appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    COURT OF APPEAL DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    • The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court

     

    • The Court of Appeal held that an employee is only entitled to regard himself as dismissed if there is a breach of the fundamental terms of the contract of employment.

     

    • The Court further held that payment of sales commission according to the rate that is stated in the letter of appointment and the change in sales coverage area were not fundamental terms of the employment contract.
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil