Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 9 of 2021

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 9 of 2021
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 9 of 2021

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 1 June, 2021 | 0

    Is there a conflict of interest where a lawyer had witnessed the execution of an agreement and subsequently acted in a matter which breaches the said agreement?

    Case:

    SYED AHMAD IMDADZ SAID ABAS v. IMEJ MUHIBAH SDN BHD; MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA (INTERVENER) [2021] 1 LNS 477

    Brief Facts:

    • Syed Ahmad Imdadz B Said Abas is an advocate and solicitor practising as a sole proprietor in Ipoh, Perak (“Lawyer”).

     

    • Imej Muhibah Sdn Bhd (“Developer”) had complained to the Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board (“DB”) that the Lawyer is suspected of having acted in conflict of interest and having conspired to defraud it.

     

    • The Developer had entered into a Joint-Venture Agreement (“JVA”) with Pintar Asiamas Sdn Bhd (“Landowner”) who was the landowner of a piece of land in Perak (“Said Land”) to develop the Said Land into a housing scheme.

     

    • The Lawyer had witnessed the execution of the JVA by the Landowner as well as the power of attorney given by the Landowner to the Developer (“PA”).

     

    • It subsequently came to the knowledge of the Developer that during the pendency of the JVA, the Landowner who was obliged not to sell the Said Land to any third party, had entered into a sale and purchase agreement (“SPA”) to sell the Said Land to a third party.

     

    • The SPA was prepared by the Lawyer and the Lawyer had witnessed the execution of the SPA by both the Landowner and the third party.

     

    • The Lawyer denied it acted for any party to the JVA and asserted that he was not privy to the terms and conditions of the JVA and his role was merely to witness and attest the execution of the JVA and PA by the Landowner. Given this limited role, there is no misconduct on his part.

     

    • In reply, the Developer asserted that in any event, in drawing up the SPA, the Lawyer would have become apprised of the terms of the JVA and would be aware that both the JVA and the SPA were to do with the Said Land.

     

    • The Disciplinary Committee (“DC”) at a hearing conducted found the Lawyer guilty of misconduct which amounts to grave impropriety, that is to say, had gross disregard of his client’s interest and his conduct is unbefitting of an advocate and solicitor which brings the legal profession into disrepute.

     

    • The DC recommended that the Lawyer be suspended from practice for 2 years.

     

    • The Lawyer appealed to the High Court.

    HIGH COURT DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART!

    • The High Court dismissed the appeal in part where it agreed with the finding of liability of the DC. There were evidence to show that the Lawyer’s involvement went beyond that of mere attestation or witnessing of the JVA and PA.

     

    • Therefore, the Lawyer had acted in conflict of interest and the attempt to cover up the same is conduct unbefitting that of an advocate and solicitor.

     

    • However, the court was of the view that the DB ought to have notified the Lawyer of its intention to impose a punishment or penalty that is likely to be adverse against him and given him a reasonable opportunity to be heard to defend himself against the proposed punishment.

     

    • Therefore, the order of punishment of the DB is set aside with the matter to be remitted back to the DB for the DB to give the Lawyer a reasonable opportunity to be heard before it makes an order that is likely to be adverse against the Lawyer.
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil