Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 10 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 10 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 10 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 14 June, 2022 | 0

    Whether an illegitimate child born outside of Malaysia to a Malaysian biological father and Filipino mother is entitled to become a Malaysian citizen?

    Case:

    CTEB & ANOR v KETUA PENGARAH PENDAFTARAN NEGARA, MALAYSIA & ORS [2022] MLJ 236 – FEDERAL COURT [CIVIL APPEAL NO: 01(i)-34-10 OF 2019(W)]

    Brief Facts:

    • CTEB was born in the Philippines on 27 September 2010 to his biological father, a Malaysian [the Father] and, his mother, a Filipino citizen of the Republic of Philippines [the Mother].

     

    • At the time of CTEB’s birth, the Father and the Mother were not married therefore making CTEB illegitimate at the time of his birth (born out of wedlock). The registration of marriage was subsequently done five months after CTEB was born.

     

    • In April 2011, an application for Malaysian citizenship was made on behalf of CTEB pursuant to Article 15A of Federal Constitution 1957 (“FC”), which provides the Federal Government special powers as it thinks fit to register a child. However, the application was rejected and is non-appealable.

     

    • Subsequently, both the Father and Mother commenced proceedings at the High Court for a declaration that CTEB was a Malaysian citizen pursuant to Articles 14(1) (b) and 15(2) of the FC which governs the law of citizenship but was still dismissed.

     

    • An appeal was then made to the Court of Appeal based on Article 14(1) (b) of the FC. Nevertheless the Court of Appeal rejected the appeal and upheld the decision made by the High Court. Both Courts have rejected the application primarily on the basis that if a child is born out of wedlock or prior to the registration of the parent’s marriage, the citizenship status of the child shall be determined by his mother’s citizenship status at the time of his birth. Hence, an appeal was made to the Federal Court.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The Federal Court rejected the Parent’s appeal. There were two important points noted by the Federal Court.

     

    • Firstly, the Federal Court held that Section 17 of Part III of the Second Schedule of the FC avers that in relation to Part III of the Second Schedule of the FC, the word ‘father’ shall be referred to as ‘mother’ at all cost in cases where an illegitimate child is involved. Therefore, the only clear meaning to be concluded here is that the child’s citizenship follows that of his mother.

     

    • The Federal Constitution distinguished the importance of a legitimate and an illegitimate child. Only a legitimate child can be admitted as a citizen by operation of law.

     

    • While CTEB’s biological father was a Malaysian citizen, and because of his illegitimate status since birth, CTEB cannot acquire the citizenship of his biological father. Instead, he will acquire the citizenship of his biological mother, a Filipino national.

     

    • Secondly, the attempt by the Father and the Mother to legitimise CTEB after his birth cannot make him a citizen of Malaysia by operation of law under Article 14 of the FC.

     

    • A person is only deemed legitimate from the prescribed date or date of the parent’s marriage. Thus, the subsequent marriage of the parents would not change the birth status of the Child as an illegitimate child. This effect cannot work retrospectively.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil