Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 6 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 6 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 6 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 14 June, 2022 | 0

    Whether the terms of trade incorporated by reference in sales contract via web-link is binding on the parties?

    Case:

    OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LTD v ABLE FOOD SDN BHD
    [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02(IM)(NCC)-1793-11-2020]

    Brief Facts:

    • Able Food Sdn Bhd (“Respondent”), a company incorporated in Malaysia, purchased instant whole milk powder from Open Country Dairy Ltd (“Appellant”), a company incorporated in New Zealand.

     

    • Both parties entered into a sales contract between November 2016 and September 2017 (“Sales Contract”).

     

    • In each of the Sales Contract, it contained a web-link at the bottom which the Appellant referred to as the “Terms of Trade”.

     

    • During one batch of delivery of milk powder, the Respondent became aware that a substantial part of the delivery was defective. Hence, the Respondent filed a suit at the High Court in Malaysia for breach of contract in supplying milk powder that was of unmerchantable quality.

     

    • The Respondent claimed that they duly served the notice of writ on the Appellant in New Zealand, however the Appellant alleged that the notice of writ was not regularly served as it was inconsistent with s. 388 of New Zealand’s Companies Act 1993.

     

    • The Appellant then filed an application to set aside the Respondent’s notice of writ arguing that the courts in Malaysia should not assume jurisdiction over the dispute as parties had submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in New Zealand.

     

    • The Appellant contended that in the terms of trade incorporated by reference in each of the Sales Contract via the web-link, the parties agreed that the forum for any dispute was in New Zealand.

     

    • The High Court dismissed the application on the grounds that the terms of trade were not applicable as there was no consensus on the terms of trade since the ‘modified terms were not attached to the Sales Contract. Hence, the present appeal.

    COURT OF APPEAL DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    • The Court of Appeal held that the terms of trade are to be found in the web-link and formed part of the contract for the purchase of the instant whole milk powder.

     

    • The fact that the Respondent did not click on or look up the web-link did not negate the terms of trade which are contained in the web-link.

     

    • The Respondent’s failure to click and read the terms in the web-link was akin to a contracting party not bothering to read and understand the terms of a contract they enter into.

     

    • The Court of Appeal also held that the Respondent was not obliged to furnish the Appellant with a copy of the terms of trade as the document was just a “click away” on the web-link.

     

    • Therefore, the Respondent was bound by the terms of trade as it was already incorporated by reference via the web-link as provided in each Sales Contract that was signed by the Respondent.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil