Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 3 of 2022

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 3 of 2022
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 3 of 2022

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 22 February, 2022 | 0

    Can TNB exercise its statutory power to discontinue electricity supply in the absence of continuing offence under Section 37 of the Electricity Supply Act or when the said offence is no longer in existence?

    Case:

    TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v CHEW THAI KAY & ANOR [2022] 2 CLJ 333

    Brief Facts:

    • Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) (“Appellant”) is the sole licensee for the delivery and distribution of electricity under the Electrical Supply Act 1990 (“ESA”) in Peninsular Malaysia.

     

    • The 1st Respondent is the registered user of electricity supply at a premise in Perak (“premises”) and the 2nd Respondent is a commercial enterprise who purchased the premises from the 1st Respondent.

     

    • The 1st Respondent remained the registered consumer with TNB.

     

    • On 7.6.2018, TNB carried out an inspection on the meter’s installations at the premises.

     

    • Upon inspection, TNB discovered that the electricity meter’s installations had been tampered with and as such, the meter failed to accurately record the electricity utilisation.

     

    • TNB then rectified and replaced the meter. After replacing the impugned meter, TNB issued a Notice of Disconnection intending to disconnect the electricity and informed the Energy Commission of its findings at the premises that an offence has been committed under sections 37(1), (3) or (14) of the Electricity Supply Act.

     

    • The Respondents commenced an action in the High Court and applied for an injunction to restrain TNB from disconnecting the electricity supply at the premises which was granted.

     

    • TNB appealed to the Court Appeal against the injunction order but was dismissed, hence this appeal.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The facts of the present cases show that the alleged offence under section 37(1) is a past offence.

     

    • The impugned meter has been rectified and replaced (which was done by TNB), and the offence under section 37 has ceased to exist at the material time when the Notice of Disconnection was issued to the customer.

     

    • After the rectification of the meter, there was no issue of any offence being committed since the supply of electricity on the premises was properly and accurately recorded

     

    • It was held that the word “found” in section 38(1) of the ESA is very clear to indicate that the requirement of finding of meter tempering is the singular factor to trigger powers of disconnection – This is the basic condition that must be fulfilled to invoke the power of disconnection.

     

    • The Federal Court held that TNB has no lawful power to disconnect a consumer electricity supply pursuant to the amended section 38(1) of the ESA whereby Section 38(1) of ESA does not allow for future disconnection of electricity in circumstances where the offence under section 37(1) was in the past and is no longer being continued.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil