Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 21 of 2021

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 21 of 2021
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 21 of 2021

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 6 December, 2021 | 0

    Can an employer come up with a reason to dismiss an employee after the dismissal?

    Case:

    MARITIME INTELLIGENCE SDN. BHD. v. TAN AH GEK [2021] 1 LNS 1578

    Brief Facts:

    • Maritime Intelligence Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) owns an educational institution named the Netherlands Maritime Institute of Technology (“the Institute”).

     

    • Tan Ah Gek (“Jenny”) commenced employment on 17 March 2014 as the Vice President-Services & Registrar.

     

    • Jenny’s pre-employment interview was conducted by a panel comprising the President of the Institute and several directors of the company.

     

    • During the interview, Jenny made available all her certificates and qualifications including the impugned qualification relating to Newport University.

     

    • At that time, she was not queried on the qualifications nor its accreditation in Malaysia.

     

    • In short, her qualifications were accepted and fully disclosed by her.

     

    • Subsequently, throughout her employment, no one in the organization queried her on this issue either.

     

    • The complaints leading up to her dismissal arose as a consequence of a petition signed by more than half of the employees of the company, alleging that Jenny had abused her power and conducted herself unethically and unprofessionally.

     

    • The Company appointed an independent person to investigate the petition, Haji Arip, a retired director from the labour department.

     

    • Based on Haji Arip’s investigation and report, the company was convinced that Jenny had committed misconduct and issued a show-cause letter on 6 January 2015. It found Jenny’s explanation unacceptable and proceeded to conduct a domestic inquiry.

     

    • The domestic inquiry panel found that there was sufficient cogent and convincing evidence to indicate that the allegations against Jenny were established.

     

    • The Company dismissed Jenny with immediate effect vide letter dated 5 February 2015.

     

    • Jenny appealed but the Company responded stating that given the findings of improper conduct, it was untenable for her to continue in her employment with the Company.

     

    • Jenny then filed a representation under section 20 seeking reinstatement, leading to a reference to the Industrial Court.

     

    • The Industrial Court concluded that the dismissal was without just cause or excuse. The Industrial Court rejected reinstatement as an appropriate remedy but awarded Jenny compensation instead.

     

    • The Company raised for the first time in the Industrial Court, in its pleadings, the allegation that the dismissal was justified because Jenny was never qualified for her position from the outset, as her Master’s degree was from Newport University in the United States of America, which was an unaccredited university in Malaysia. Further and alternatively the company also raised for the first time that Jenny’s claim to have obtained the Master’s degree was false.

     

    • The Company sought to quash the decision of the Industrial Court in the High Court.

     

    • The High Court dismissed the Company’s application for judicial review.

     

    • The Company appealed to the Court of Appeal on the sole ground that the Industrial Court wrongly rejected and failed to consider the evidence on Jenny’s purported lack of qualifications.

     

    • The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

     

    • The Company appealed to the Federal Court.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The Federal Court held that the provisions of section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act supports the legal position that the Industrial Court is statutorily empowered only to examine, adjudicate and hand down an award as to whether the dismissal was with or without just cause or excuse premised on matters operating in the mind of the employer at the time of the dismissal.

     

    • As such the Court cannot take into account allegations raised post-dismissal to justify the dismissal.

     

    • Any such ‘just cause or excuse’ can only refer to the reason resonating in the employer’s mind, before, or preceding the decision to dismiss.

     

    • However, the Federal Court did go on to say that the Court can take into account conduct discovered post-dismissal when considering the remedy to be awarded to the employee [if the employer does not succeed in proving that a termination was with just cause and excuse].
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil