Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 20 of 2020

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 20 of 2020
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 20 of 2020

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 14 January, 2021 | 0

    If there was late delivery of a property to the buyer, should damages for late delivery be calculated from the date of the sale and purchase agreement or the date the booking fee was paid?

    Case:

    SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD v. VOON KUAN CHIEN & ANOR [2020] 5 CLJ 619

    Brief Facts:

    • Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd was the developer of a condominium (“Developer”) and had collected booking fees in contravention of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (“HDA”) and the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 (“Regulations”).

     

    • On 6 January 2012 it collected a booking fee of RM10,000 as part of the 10% deposit of the purchase price of a condominium unit and the sale and purchase agreement (“SPA”) following the mandatory Schedule H agreement dated 28 June 2012 (statutory form of the SPA).

     

    • When vacant possession was delivered to Voon Kuan Chien and others (“Purchasers”), the Purchasers filed a claim against the Developer with the Tribunal for Homebuyer Claims (“Tribunal”) for late delivery of their property.

     

    • The Purchasers argued that the delivery was beyond the 42 month period stipulated in the SPA and the Purchasers had calculated the 42 month period from the date the booking fee was paid.

     

    • The Developer however argued that 42 month period should be calculated from the date of the SPA (i.e. 28 June 2012) to the date of handing over of vacant possession.

     

    • The Developer contended that it was not liable to pay any late delivery claim as the vacant possession date in the SPA was 22 December 2016 which was within 42 calendar months from the date of the SPA on 28 June 2012.

     

    • They further contended that the Purchasers had consented to the payment of the booking fee in deviation of HDA and the Regulations and therefore it is not illegal.

     

    • The Tribunal agreed with the Purchasers on the proper commencement date of the SPA which was to be taken as the date the booking fee was paid.

     

    • Under the award of the Tribunal, the Developer was required to pay the Purchasers a sum of RM40,860-46.

     

    • Dissatisfied, the Developer applied for judicial review to the High Court to quash the Tribunal’s decision.

     

    • The High Court found in favour of the Purchasers and the Developer appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    COURT OF APPEAL DECISION – APPEAL DISMISSED!

    • The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and held that it was irrelevant that the Purchasers consented to the payment of the booking fee because the HDA and the Regulations are there to protect the purchasers and the prohibition would have no bite if a booking fee or a deposit less than 10% of the purchase price is collected without the signing of the SPA.

     

    • The Court essentially held that the Developer cannot circumvent the scope of the HDA and collect a booking fee which was prohibited by law.

     

    • Therefore, the Court had no problem calculating the late delivery claim from the date the booking fee was paid and not from the date of the SPA.

     

    • To calculate the late delivery claim from the SPA date would be to allow the perpetuation of a practice that the Regulations prohibit.
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil