Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 19 of 2016

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 19 of 2016
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 19 of 2016

    By Admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 8 January, 2017 | 0

    Bankruptcy – Whether proper for third party to settle debts of a bankrupt without the knowledge of or reference to Director General of Insolvency and Offical Assginee

    Case:

    Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi v Goh Ah Kai & Anor, [2016] 1 MLRA 419, CA

    Brief Facts:

    • The first respondent [R] was adjudged a bankrupt in January 2013.
    • In November 2013, a third party fully paid the judgment debt owed to the Judgment Creditor.
    • The Judgment Creditor wrote to the Director General of Insolvency (DGI) stating that the third party had fully paid the amount owing to it and that it was withdrawing its proof of debt.
    • The R then applied for the bankruptcy order against him to be annulled.
    • The DGI opposed the application on the grounds that the;
    • i. Debt was not settled in accordance with the correct procedure;
    • ii. Third party is not allowed to make payment on behalf of the debtor;
    • iii. Before any annulment, the DGI is entitled to realise distribution fees.
    • The High Court allowed the R’s application to annul the Bankruptcy Order.
    • Hence, the present appeal by the DGI.
    • The issue for appeal was that whether a third party can pay R’s debt directly to the Creditor without referring to the DGI and Official Assignee (OA).

    Decision: Appeal Allowed

    • The law relating to bankruptcy in Malaysia is governed by the Bankruptcy Act 1967 (BA).
    • Bankruptcy laws are premised on the need to protect creditors.
    • Accordingly, the conduct of the debtors’ affairs is taken out of his hands and vested in the office of the OA; OA’s function is to realise the assets of the debtor and from the proceeds make such payments (in the form of dividends) to the creditors, insofar as that is possible.
    • The OA is empowered to trace and recover any property of the debtor in the hands of third parties.
    • The estate of the debtor is distributed among the creditors who are able to satisfy the OA that the debtor owes them a legally recoverable debt.
    • In exercising its discretion whether or not to annul adjudication, the Court is bound to consider not only the interest of creditors.
    • The Court must also consider the also consider whether an annulment is conducive or detrimental to commercial morality and to the interest of the public at large.
    • As such, any private arrangements between a debtor (and a third party) and his creditor is to be condemned.
    • Hence, all matters relating to the bankrupt’s estate shall be dealt through the OA.
    • Whatever private arrangemnet or transactions entered into between the bankrupt or any third party and his creditors without reference to or knowledge of the OA is not binding on the estate of the bankrupt.
    • The purported payment was not made through the OA.
    • The OA has no knowledge of the payment transactions and such the OA is unable to verify whether the debt has in fact been paid full in cash.
    • In addition, it has never been held that the consent of the creditors alone will justify the Court in annuling the adjudication.
    • In any application for annulment of an adjudication, it is necessary that DGI is made party in the proceedings and it is for the official assignee as receiver and manager of the estate of the bankrupt to satisfy the Court that the conditions for annulment are satisfied.
    • Therefore, the Court is not bound to exercise its discretion in annulling an adjudication simply because the creditors consented to the same.

    No tags.

    Admin

    More posts by Admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 3 of 2022
    • Legal Update 2 of 2022
    • Legal Update 1 of 2022
    • Legal Update 24 of 2021 (end)
    • Legal Update 23 of 2021
    • Legal Update 22 of 2021
    • Legal Update 21 of 2021

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil