Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 13 of 2021

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 13 of 2021
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 13 of 2021

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 19 August, 2021 | 0

    Are media platforms liable for comments left by third parties?

    Case:

    PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA v. MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD & ANOR [2021] 3 CLJ 603

    Brief Facts:

    • Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd (“Malaysiakini”) is an online news portal that allows for the publication of comments by way of online forum responses to news articles.

     

    • Gan Diong Keng (“Mr. Gan”) is the chief editor of Malaysiakini.

     

    • On the 9th of June 2020, Malaysiakini published an article titled “Musa Aman acquitted after prosecution applies to drop all charges”.

     

    • On the very same day, Malaysiakini published an article titled “CJ orders all courts to be fully operational from July 1”

     

    • Comments (“impugned comments”) by third-party online subscribers were left on Malaysiakini’s website.

     

    • As a consequence, the Attorney General of Malaysia (“AG”), by way of an ex parte notice of motion applied for leave to commence contempt proceedings against Malaysiakini and Mr. Gan.

     

    • In civil procedures, ex parte is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for a response from the other side. Generally, these are orders that are made in an urgent situation.

     

    • Malaysiakini applied to set aside the leave for contempt granted to the AG. The application was heard and dismissed.

     

    • The issue that arises for consideration, in this case, is whether Malaysiakini and Mr. Gan are liable in contempt for impugned comments left by third parties.

     

    • Malaysiakini admitted that the comments are indeed offensive, inappropriate, disrespectful, and contemptuous. However, Malaysiakini stated that they cannot be held liable for the acts of others, such as the third-party online subscribers that made the impugned comments.

     

    • Malaysiakini explained that the 3 measures it had taken to safeguard itself from both pre and post-publication comments by third-party subscribers are by its terms and conditions warning, a filter program that disallows the use of certain foul words, and a peer reporting system.

    FEDERAL COURT DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED IN PART!

    The Federal Court allowed the application against Malaysiakini and dismissed the application against Mr. Gan on the basis that:

     

    • Malaysiakini was deemed to be a publisher of the comments by virtue of the presumption under S114A Evidence Act 1950.

     

    • To avoid liability, Malaysiakini must have in place a system that is capable of detecting and rapidly remove offensive comments. The safeguards adopted by Malaysiakini have proved to fail and do not efficiently control or prevent offensive comments from being published.

     

    • To accept such measures as a complete defense will be to allow it to unjustifiably and irresponsibly shift the entire blame on its third-party online subscribers while freeing itself of all liabilities.

     

    • The Federal Court is firm in their view that the Malaysiakini have failed to explain that they have no knowledge of the impugned comments.

     

    • Freedom of opinion and expression is guaranteed and protected by our Federal Constitution, but it must be done within the bounds permissible by the law.
    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil