Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 1 of 2016

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 1 of 2016
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 1 of 2016

    By admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 7 January, 2017 | 0

    Defamation – Whether the photograph mistakenly published in a newspaper article was defamatory.

    Case:

    Penerbit Sahabat (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor v Kalairasi Arumugam [2016] 1 CLJ 30

    Brief Facts:

    • The respondent (“Kalairasi”) sued the appellants (“PSSB”) for defamation due to a misprint on an article in a newspaper known as Malaysia Namban (Sunday edition) owned and published by PSSB.
    • PSSB was alleged to have published an article relating to an interview between one Sarathi Krishnan, a local actor, dramatist and singer, and one Sujatha, also a local actress.
    • Sujatha, during the interview, had narrated her experiences in the performing arts and her life.
    • However, when the article was published, PSSB had accidentally published the picture of Kalairasi in place of Sujatha.
    • Hence, Kalairasi claimed that a portion of the text, particularly the excerpt ‘… I fell in love with Poobalan and married him. I have two daughters by the name of Tharshana and Thulasi…’ were defamatory of her.
    • Kalairasi claimed that the article imputed that she had been married previously and hence, damaged her reputation.
    • Kalairasi also claimed that her photograph was published without her knowledge and consent.
    • PSSB contended that the article was not defamatory to Kalairasi.
    • PSSB rebutted that the content of the article as a whole referred to Sujatha and not Kalairasi, notwithstanding that Kalairasi’s photograph was published along with the article.
    • PSSB further admitted that there was a misprint and the mistake has been rectified at the earliest possible opportunity upon discovery of the mistake (i.e. in the next Sunday Edition newspaper).
    • The trial judge found that Kalairasi had proved her claim of defamation against PSSB on the balance of probabilities and hence, PSSB filed the instant appeal.

    Decision: Allowing PSSB's appeal

    • The trial judge had failed to take into consideration the whole paragraph of the statement but instead relied solely upon the disputed words to come to her findings.
    • The offending excerpt could not be read in isolation and must be read in reference to the whole paragraph to see the full picture.
    • The whole paragraph was purely Sujatha’s brief narrative of her life and involvement in the arts scene and had nothing to do with Kalairasi’s personal life.
    • The article had not once referred to Kalairasi either by her name or through other means.
    • The translation of the whole article only made reference to Sujatha’s name, neither did the photograph made any reference to any person in particular.
    • The testimonies of witnesses also did not coincide with the trial judge’s findings that any reader of the article, with the caption beside her photograph, would infer that Kalairasi was Sujatha.
    • The disputed words in the article, having regard to its language (i.e. Tamil), could not be regarded as capable of referring to Kalairasi despite her photograph being published together with the said article.
    • Hence, the inference made by the trial judge was baseless.
    • Furthermore, the article, in particular the paragraph with the disputed words, did not lead reasonable people who knew Kalairasi to think that the paragraph referred to her.

    No tags.

    admin

    https://t.me/pump_upp

    More posts by admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 9 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a civil servant be dismissed from employment by a local authority without affording him the right to be heard? Case: PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEBERANG PERAI & ANOR v. MUZIADI MUKHTAR [2020] 1Read more

    • Legal Update 10 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the payment of quit rent, assessment rates, electricity and water bills be used to prove ownership of property? Case: HS REALTY SDN BHD v. YOW HONG SOON [2020] 1 LNS 230 Brief Facts: HSRead more

    • Legal Update 11 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can accused persons who are convicted of disobeying the Movement Control Order appeal for alternative punishment instead of imprisonment in the interest of justice? Case: CHIN CHEE WEI & ANOR V PP [2020] 1 LNSRead more

    • Legal Update 12 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a foreign national have a permanent contract of employment? Case: AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID v. AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD [2020] 1 LNS 494 Brief Facts: Ahmad, an expatriate, received a letter of appointmentRead more

    • Legal Update 13 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the giving of legal advice by an adjudged bankrupt, whose practising certificate has been suspended, amount to practising law in contravention of the Legal Profession Act 1976? Case: DARSHAN SINGH KHAIRA v. ZULKEFLI HASHIMRead more

    • Legal Update 14 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can individual parcel owners enforce rights relating to common property on their own behalf? Case: SYARIKAT EAST COAST & ORS v. MAKNA MUJUR SDN BHD & ORS [2020] 2 MLRA 440 Brief Facts: Syarikat EastRead more

    • Legal Update 15 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      When is the point of time when a debtor is considered to be unable to pay his debts? Case: AFFIN BANK BERHAD V. ABU BAKAR ISMAIL [2020] 2 MLRA 99 Brief Facts: Affin Bank BerhadRead more

    • Legal Update 16 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Whether an article containing allegations of corrupt practices and giving of bribes was defamatory to the owner of an education institution? Case: EAGLE ONE INVESTMENT LTD & ORS V. ASIA PACIFIC HIGHER LEARNING SDN BHDRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory
    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 22 of 2022
    • Legal Update 21 of 2022
    • Legal Update 20 of 2022
    • Legal Update 19 of 2022
    • Legal Update 18 of 2022
    • Legal Update 17 of 2022
    • Legal Update 16 of 2022

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • About
    • Our People
      • Partners
      • Consultant
      • Associates
    • Practice Areas
    • Publications
      • Legal Updates
      • Legal Cauldron (Temporary suspended)
      • Articles
      • News & Bulletin
    • We Care
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil