“Whether anonymity should be granted in Family Law related cases?”
CASE:
BRIEF FACTS:
- RIN (Wife) and MIN (Husband) got married in 1998, and had 2 children born in 2003 and 2006 respectively.
- RIN filed for divorce in 2024 alleging adultery and naming a Co-Respondent (VIN)
- This application was filed by MIN in June 2024, seeking anonymity for all parties and related details in the proceedings, as well as to restrict media coverage or publication of any identifying details.
DECISION BY THE HIGH COURT (HC)
- HC found that anonymity was justified to protect privacy, dignity and emotional well-being of all parties, including adult children.
- HC stated that legal adulthood does not make someone immune to emotional harm especially in family cases that involve deeply personal and distressing information.
- HC also found that there was no public interest, stating that public curiosity does not override the right to privacy in family matters.
- Further, it was stated that MIN being a public servant does not remove someone’s right to confidentiality in personal disputes. Justice must treat all equally.
- The Court strongly disapproved of RIN’s objection to anonymity stating that it appeared to be motivated by a wish to publicly shame MIN and VIN.
- HC further stated that anonymity would also help encourage settlement and further reduce emotional harm.
- HC granted anonymity for all parties involved, including the Co-Respondent and the children.
- The Hearings would also be closed to the public.
- HC ordered RM 8,000 in costs against RIN to be paid to MIN.
Leave a Comment