Jayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & JamilJayadeep Hari & Jamil
  • About
  • Our People
    • Partners
    • Consultant
    • Associates
  • Practice Areas
  • Publications
    • Legal Updates
    • Legal Cauldron
    • Articles
    • News & Bulletin
  • We Care
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Legal Update 5 of 2020

    Home Legal Updates Legal Update 5 of 2020
    NextPrevious

    Legal Update 5 of 2020

    By jhj admin | Legal Updates | 0 comment | 11 January, 2021 | 0

    Was there a concluded contract for the appointment of a real estate agent even though the letter of appointment was unsigned?

    Case:

    ZERIN PROPERTIES V NAZA TTDI SDN BHD [2020] 1 MLRA 362

    Brief Facts:

    • Zerin Properties was a licensed real estate agency (“Agent”).

     

    • Naza TTDI Sdn Bhd was a property development company (“Developer”).

     

    • The Agent claimed that it had been approached by the Developer to market the sale of various plots of development land.

     

    • The Agent claimed that its endeavours and work led to the conclusion of a joint venture between the Developer and Hap Seng Land Sdn Bhd (“Hap Seng”) in respect of one (1) plot of development land (“Development Land 1”).

     

    • A letter of acceptance was sent by the Agent in respect of Development Land 1 which was unsigned by the Developer (“LOA 1”). A subsequent letter of acceptance was signed but concerned a different piece of land (“LOA 2”).

     

    • The Developer later denied approaching the Agent and denied that any amount was due and owing to the Agent.

     

    • The Agent sued the Developer in the High Court to recover its professional fees for work done and services rendered.

     

    • The High Court judge dismissed the Agent’s claim on the grounds that (i) the Agent was not validly appointed by the Developer to sell Development Land 1; (ii) the Agent was not the effective cause of the sale or that the joint venture did not amount to a sale; (iii) LOA 1 was unenforceable because it was unsigned; and (iv) LOA 2 was in respect of a different piece of land.

     

    • The Agent appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    COURT OF APPEAL DECISION – APPEAL ALLOWED!

    The Court of Appeal held that there was a valid contract in respect of LOA 1 even though it was unsigned. The LOA 1 must be construed in its entirety. Based on the dealings between the Agent and the Developer taken in its proper context and in totality there was a concluded contract as to the Agent’s appointment as the Developer’s agent, although LOA 1 was not signed. There was a concluded contract as the parties had conducted themselves as if there was a contract afoot, i.e. a contract by estoppel.

    No tags.

    jhj admin

    More posts by jhj admin

    Related Post

    • Legal Update 1 of 2021

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a person who has given a property by way of a gift claim caveatable interest over the said property subsequently? Case: HANNAH KAM ZHEN YI v. TAN SRI DATO’ KAM WOON WAH & ANORRead more

    • Legal Update 24 of 2020 (end of 2020)

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a purchaser of an auction property claim trespass on the basis that it was unaware of the existence of retention pond and structures on the auction land? Case: BAYANGAN SEPADU SDN BHD v. JABATANRead more

    • Legal Update 23 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a management corporation suspend the usage of the common facilities or common services due to arrears owing by a proprietor, which arrears are disputed by the proprietor? Case: PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN 3 TWO SQUARE v.Read more

    • Legal Update 22 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can a purchaser claim for the potential loss of profit on a property successfully bid at an auction if the property bid is subsequently claimed by someone else later? Case: PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK PEJABAT TANAH DANRead more

    • Legal Update 21 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the courts grant an extension of time for completion of a contract which performance has been delayed or hindered due to the movement control order? Case: HO KEAN PIN v. MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD &Read more

    • Legal Update 20 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      If there was late delivery of a property to the buyer, should damages for late delivery be calculated from the date of the sale and purchase agreement or the date the booking fee was paid?Read more

    • Legal Update 19 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can the management corporation of a building enact house rules to prohibit short-term rentals? Case: INNAB SALIL & ORS v. VERVE SUITES MONT’ KIARA (CIVIL APPEAL NO: 02(i)-74-10/2019(W) Brief Facts: Innab Salil and others (“SaidRead more

    • Legal Update 18 of 2020

      By jhj admin | 0 comment

      Can statistical data not premised on words be found to be defamatory in nature? Case: SUN MEDIA CORPORATION SDN BHD v. THE NIELSEN COMPANY (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD [2020] 7 CLJ 751 Brief Facts: Sun MediaRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    JHJ Bulletin

    • S.Jeyaraman: The Magic of Memory

      JHJ had the pleasure of meeting one …

    • Andreas Dorn: Your Unconscious Mind on Change and Money

      It is the last month of the …

    Legal Updates

    • Legal Update 1 of 2021
    • Legal Update 24 of 2020 (end of 2020)
    • Legal Update 23 of 2020
    • Legal Update 22 of 2020
    • Legal Update 21 of 2020
    • Legal Update 20 of 2020
    • Legal Update 19 of 2020

    Legal Cauldron

    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 1 of 2016

      Click here to view & download
    • 2
      0

      Legal Cauldron 2 of 2015

      Click here to view & download
    Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved Contact Us         Like & Follow Us On:Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
    • 20th Anniversary
    • About
    • Articles
    • Associates
    • Careers
    • Consultant
    • Contact Us
      • Ipoh
      • Kota Bharu
      • Melaka
      • Petaling Jaya
    • Disclaimer
    • Home
    • Industry Experience
    • Legal Cauldron
    • Legal Updates
    • Nature Of Practice
    • News & Bulletin
    • Our People
    • Partners
      • Adrian Thambyrajah
      • Jayadeep Bhanudevan
      • Siti Aminah Md Hanafi
    • Practice Areas
      • Banking & Finance
      • Building & Construction
      • Commerce & Trading
      • Corporate And Commercial
      • Dispute resolution, Arbitration & Mediation
      • Energy Oil & Gas
      • Healthcare
      • Human Resource & Industrial Relations
      • Information & Communication Technology
      • Insurance and Takaful
      • Knowledge and Advisory
      • Mining & Quarrying
      • Real Estate and Property Related Ventures
      • Telecommunication
      • Transportation and Logistics
    • Privacy Notice
    • Privacy Policy and Data Protection
    • Publications
    • We Care
    Jayadeep Hari & Jamil